This project is read-only.

100% R6RS?

Feb 28, 2013 at 10:20 AM
Umnn, what would it take to say "IronScheme is 100% R6RS compliant"?
Mar 25, 2013 at 11:38 AM

Like previously discussed with you, making IronScheme 100% compliant (basically meaning full support for continuations) would break .NET interoperability.

If you do that, you basically have just another Scheme, but losing out on the .NET interoperability niche.

There is no way to make .NET continuation friendly unless you rewrite and recompile all of .NET to support it (say via CPS, if this is even possible for MSIL based bytecode).